Resource consumption of animal breeding in comparison

As con­su­mers and buy­ers, we are used to full ref­ri­gera­ted coun­ters in Ger­ma­ny: whe­ther beef, pork, poul­try or fish, ever­ything is always avail­ab­le in rough quan­ti­ties. If we now con­si­der how many super­mar­kets the­re are in our area, this con­su­mer offer quick­ly adds up. What con­su­mers often fail to con­si­der, howe­ver, is that enor­mous resour­ces are requi­red for the growth of the ani­mals. Logi­cal­ly, the lar­ger the ani­mal, the more water and feed are nee­ded. But ani­mals – just like humans – do not ful­ly uti­li­ze ever­ything they eat. Due to the incre­a­sing scar­ci­ty of water and the rising pro­te­in requi­re­ments of our rapidly gro­wing world popu­la­ti­on (accord­ing to fore­casts, nine bil­li­on peop­le will live on the earth in 2050), the ques­ti­on ari­ses as to which ani­mal is most effi­ci­ent in the use of natu­ral resour­ces in terms of mee­ting our pro­te­in requirements?

To ans­wer the­se ques­ti­ons, we make a com­pa­ri­son bet­ween fish, poul­try, pork and beef. We inves­ti­ga­te feed con­ver­si­on, water con­sump­ti­on, land use, and the pol­lu­ti­on of ground­wa­ter and air during the pro­duc­tion of one kilo­gram of pro­te­in. We use the con­sump­ti­on data of sea fish from aquacul­tu­re as a basis and refer to the data of other species.

Alt­hough fish live in a lar­ge water body, it has been shown that the freshwa­ter con­sump­ti­on in fish far­ming is signi­fi­cant­ly lower than in other ani­mal hus­bandries. The dif­fe­rence comes from the fact that this balan­ce inclu­des not only the sur­roun­ding or drin­king water but also the water con­sump­ti­on for feed pro­duc­tion. The more feed an ani­mal requi­res, the grea­ter the water consumption.

If you look at the feed requi­re­ment, fish and poul­try are on the same level. Pigs need about twice as much feed as fish and catt­le even four times as much to gain body weight. This is becau­se fish are warm ani­mals. Their body tem­pe­ra­tu­re always cor­re­sponds to the ambi­ent tem­pe­ra­tu­re and they do not need the food to pro­du­ce body heat. All the ener­gy in the food is the­re­fo­re con­ver­ted into bio­mass. Chi­ckens, pigs and catt­le, on the other hand, need part of the feed to main­tain their body tem­pe­ra­tu­re of appro­xi­mate­ly 39°C. The­re­fo­re, they have to take in con­si­der­ab­ly more feed.

In terms of space requi­re­ments for the pro­duc­tion, theo­re­ti­cal­ly more fish than any other ani­mal pro­te­in source can be pro­du­ced in the same space. On the one hand, this is due to the fact that fish are swarm ani­mals and are gene­ral­ly com­for­ta­ble even with high sto­cking den­si­ties. On the other hand, the area requi­red for feed pro­duc­tion must also be inclu­ded in the balan­ce. About 80 % of the world’s agri­cul­tu­ral land is used for fod­der pro­duc­tion and pas­tu­re­land for live­stock bree­ding. This means that land con­sump­ti­on in live­stock far­ming is enor­mous and many times grea­ter than in fish farming.

Other resour­ces that are influ­en­ced by food pro­duc­tion are ground­wa­ter and air. Ground­wa­ter is pol­lu­t­ed when too many ani­mals are kept in a too small space and then more nut­ri­ents are released into the soil through the excre­ments of the ani­mals, i.e. liquid manu­re, which is spread out on the field, than the soil can tole­ra­te in the natu­ral cycle. Due to the incre­a­sed nut­ri­ent con­tent, espe­cial­ly nitro­gen is released from the soil during rain­fall and enters the ground­wa­ter. This pro­cess is also known as „eutro­phi­ca­ti­on“. The air is also pol­lu­t­ed by live­stock far­ming. Bes­i­des CO₂, the metha­ne pro­du­ced by rumi­nants (catt­le) during diges­ti­on is main­ly respon­si­ble for the emis­si­on of cli­ma­te-dama­ging gases. In addi­ti­on, ammo­nia con­tri­bu­tes to the impairment of air qua­li­ty as a result of liquid manu­re fertilization.

In view of the­se figu­res, we can the­re­fo­re clear­ly ans­wer the ques­ti­on of the most effi­ci­ent ani­mal food: fish has the least impact on the envi­ron­ment during pro­duc­tion com­pa­red to all other ani­mal pro­te­in sources. But we should not rest on our lau­rels, becau­se fish far­ming also has envi­ron­ment­al­ly harm­ful and envi­ron­ment­al­ly friend­ly sys­tems (see blog post). Our aim is to make fish far­ming as resour­ce-saving and ani­mal-friend­ly as pos­si­ble. The SEAWATER Cube as a clo­sed recir­cu­la­ting sys­tem ful­fils this claim. With the help of bio­lo­gi­cal and mecha­ni­cal fil­ter sta­ges, more than 99% of the water in the plant is recy­cled, only a small pro­por­ti­on of the resi­du­al sub­s­tan­ces is still dischar­ged as sludge. In addi­ti­on, the fee­ding of the ani­mals is opti­mi­zed, and the con­trol sys­tem ensu­res that only as much is fed as the ani­mals can take in. We have also deter­mi­ned an opti­mal sto­cking den­si­ty for our fish spe­ci­es, at which the ani­mals do not feel stress and do not get sick, and at which pro­duc­tion is as effi­ci­ent as pos­si­ble. Howe­ver, at 65 kg/m³, this is signi­fi­cant­ly below the tole­ra­ble sto­cking den­si­ty of 100 kg/m³ spe­ci­fied in the literature.

Ulti­mate­ly, every con­su­mer should ask hims­elf the ques­ti­on of how much meat he real­ly wants to inclu­de in his nut­ri­ti­on and how the rela­ti­ons­hip bet­ween the various ani­mal spe­ci­es can be chan­ged with respect for the envi­ron­ment. If we were to chan­ge our eating habits and cover a lar­ger pro­por­ti­on of our pro­te­in requi­re­ments with fish in the future, the free agri­cul­tu­ral land could be used to grow rice or pota­toes, for examp­le. This would save valu­able freshwa­ter and at the same time more peop­le could be fed by plants.

Refe­ren­ces:

— Ernäh­rungs- und Land­wirt­schafts­or­ga­ni­sa­ti­on der Ver­ein­ten Natio­nen (FAO) Berich­te von 2006, 2010 und 2012
— Thü­nen Insti­tut für Markt­ana­ly­se, Gerd Hubold und Rai­ner Klep­per, „Die Bedeu­tung von Fische­rei und Aqua­kul­tur für die glo­ba­le Ernäh­rungs­si­che­rung“, Thü­nen Working Paper 3, Braun­schweig, 2013
—  https://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2013–08/fleisch-konsum-ressourcen/, 29.09.2018
—  https://www.peta.de/weltwassertag, 07.03.2019
https://mobil.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/wwf_studie_wasserfussabdruck.pdf, 07.03.2019
https://www.welt.de/wissenschaft/article6012574/Ein-Kilo-Rindfleisch-kostet-15–000-Liter-Wasser.html, 07.03.2019
https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/land-forstwirtschaft/beitrag-der-landwirtschaft-zu-den-treibhausgas#textpart‑1, 07.03.2019

Newsletter abonnieren

Du möchtest regelmäßige Updates zu SEAWATER Cubes erhalten? In unserem monatlichen Newsletter informieren wir zu aktuellen Themen und Entwicklungen rund um unser Unternehmen. Außerdem warten spannende Fachbeiträge zum Thema Aquakultur sowie exklusive Informationen zu Veranstaltungen auf Dich.

Vielen Dank! Du hast Dich erfolgreich für unseren Newsletter angemeldet.